<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a mARTIAN dIARY &#187; unEarthly tERms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martiangeek.com/category/unearthly-terms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martiangeek.com</link>
	<description>tHE RaNTS oF a pOOr sOUl StuCK oN ThE WRONG!!! rOCK OrBiTiNg tHE fIreBaLL bY a cRUel tWiSt oF fAtE....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Black Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/09/06/black-swan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/09/06/black-swan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/09/06/black-swan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Black Swan is defined as a rare event with three very special characteristics:

It is not predicted, 
it has massive consequences usually on a global scale, and
in retrospect people invariable claim that they could have predicted it if they had been paying attention.

Examples of Black Swans are 9/11, the Netscape IPO, and the stock crash [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Black Swan is defined as a rare event with three very special characteristics:</p>
<ol>
<li>It is not predicted, </li>
<li>it has massive consequences usually on a global scale, and</li>
<li>in retrospect people invariable claim that they could have predicted it if they had been paying attention.</li>
</ol>
<p>Examples of Black Swans are 9/11, the Netscape IPO, and the stock crash of October 1987.</p>
<p>Taken from <a href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/09/black-swans-on-ip-lake.html" target="_blank">Core Values</a> </p>
<p>It seems to be the cause of one of the various strategic inflection point that&nbsp; can hit a industry that Andy Gorve talks about in his book &quot;Only The Paranoid Survive&quot;.&nbsp; Seems like a good time to wrestle away control of a industry from any stong players,say like Google? Could make a good story IMO <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/09/06/black-swan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Termination Charge&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/18/termination-charge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/18/termination-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/18/termination-charge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do I have to pay more to call from one network to another?  
Most of the tariff&#8217;s we see in for mobiles/fixed lines are with different costs to call &#8220;with-in&#8221; the network, outside network mobiles and then fixed land line. 
This is because of a charge called the termination charge.   Since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Why do I have to pay more to call from one network to another?</em>  </p>
<p>Most of the tariff&rsquo;s we see in for mobiles/fixed lines are with different costs to call &ldquo;with-in&rdquo; the network, outside network mobiles and then fixed land line. </p>
<p>This is because of a charge called the termination charge.   Since we follow the &ldquo;Calling Party Pays&rdquo; principle, every time we connect  from our operator A to a operator say H, A needs to pay H some part of the charge levied from us for the call, as rights to use a part of H&rsquo;s network to access phone in H&rsquo;s network.  This is a strictly regulated charge since if it were a free market, very un-ethical strategies can be employed. Even now, the part of the cost that is passed on to the customer has only an upper limit and interesting strategies can be employed <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>This charge exists in VOIP also, as the termination charge paid to the non-VOIP network that forms that last part of the chain though which the data is routed and this is why VOIP is not as cheap as it seems to be. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/18/termination-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personality (dis!)order</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/05/personality-disorder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/05/personality-disorder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/05/101/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took this Personality (dis!)order test at http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv.
Heaven for the hypochondriac&#8217;s like me  
It has come up with some interesting results   
Paranoid: High Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a distrust of others and a constant suspicion that people around you have sinister motives. People with this disorder tend to have excessive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this Personality (dis!)order test at http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv.</p>
<p>Heaven for the hypochondriac&rsquo;s like me <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It has come up with some interesting results <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><strong>Paranoid: <font color="#ff0000">High </font><br /></strong><br />Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a distrust of others and a constant suspicion that people around you have sinister motives. People with this disorder tend to have excessive trust in their own knowledge and abilities and usually avoid close relationships. They search for hidden meanings in everything and read hostile intentions into the actions of others. They are quick to challenge the loyalties of friends and loved ones and often appear cold and distant. They usually shift blame to other people and tend to carry long grudges.</p>
<p><strong>Schizoid: <font color="#cc00ff">Moderate</font></strong></p>
<p>People with schizoid personality disorder avoid relationships and do not show much emotion. Unlike avoidants, schizoids genuinely prefer to be alone and do not secretly wish for popularity. They tend to seek jobs that require little social contact. Their social skills are often weak and they do not show a need for attention or acceptance. They are perceived by others as humorless and distant and often are termed &quot;loners.&quot;</p>
<p><strong>Schizotypal: <font color="#ff0000">High </font></strong></p>
<p>Many believe that schizotypal personality disorder represents mild schizophrenia. The disorder is characterized by odd forms of thinking and perceiving, and individuals with this disorder often seek isolation from others. They sometimes believe to have extra sensory ability or that unrelated events relate to them in some important way. They generally engage in eccentric behavior and have difficulty concentrating for long periods of time. Their speech is often over elaborate and difficult to follow.</p>
<p><strong>Antisocial: <font color="#0033ff">Low </font></strong></p>
<p>A common misconception is that antisocial personality disorder refers to people who have poor social skills. The opposite is often the case. Instead, antisocial personality disorder is characterized by a lack of conscience. People with this disorder are prone to criminal behavior, believing that their victims are weak and deserving of being taken advantage of. Antisocials tend to lie and steal. Often, they are careless with money and take action without thinking about consequences. They are often agressive and are much more concerned with their own needs than the needs of others.</p>
<p><strong>Borderline: <font color="#0033ff">Low </font></strong></p>
<p>Borderline personality disorder is characterized by mood instability and poor self-image. People with this disorder are prone to constant mood swings and bouts of anger. Often, they will take their anger out on themselves, causing injury to their own body. Suicidal threats and actions are not uncommon. Borderlines think in very black and white terms and often form intense, conflict-ridden relationships. They are quick to anger when their expectations are not met.</p>
<p><strong>Histrionic: <font color="#ff0000">High </font></strong></p>
<p>People with histrionic personality disorder are constant attention seekers. They need to be the center of attention all the time, often interrupting others in order to dominate the conversation. They use grandiose language to discribe everyday events and seek constant praise. They may dress provacatively or exaggerate illnesses in order to gain attention. Histrionics also tend to exaggerate friendships and relationships, believing that everyone loves them. They are often manipulative.</p>
<p><strong>Narcissistic: <font color="#ff0000">High </font></strong></p>
<p>Narcissistic personality disorder is characterized by self-centeredness. Like histrionic disorder, people with this disorder seek attention and praise. They exaggerate their achievements, expecting others to recongize them as being superior. They tend to be choosy about picking friends, since they believe that not just anyone is worthy of being their friend. Narcissists tend to make good first impressions, yet have difficulty maintaining long-lasting relationships. They are generally uninterested in the feelings of others and may take advantage of them<br /><strong><br />Avoidant: <font color="#cc00cc">Moderate </font></strong></p>
<p>Avoidant personality disorder is characterized by extreme social anxiety. People with this disorder often feel inadequate, avoid social situations, and seek out jobs with little contact with others. Avoidants are fearful of being rejected and worry about embarassing themselves in front of others. They exaggerate the potential difficulties of new situations to rationalize avoiding them. Often, they will create fantasy worlds to substitute for the real one. Unlike schizoid personality disorder, avoidants yearn for social relations yet feel they are unable to obtain them. They are frequently depressed and have low self-confidence.</p>
<p><strong>Dependent: <font color="#ff0000">High</font></strong></p>
<p>Dependent personality disorder is characterized by a need to be taken care of. People with this disorder tend to cling to people and fear losing them. They may become suicidal when a break-up is imminent. They tend to let others make important decisions for them and often jump from relationship to relationship. Dependents often remain in abusive relationships. Over-sensitivity to disapproval is common. Dependents often feel helpless and depressed.</p>
<p><strong>Obsessive-Compulsive: <font color="#ff0000">High</font></strong></p>
<p>While Obsessive-Compulsive personality disorder (OCDP) sounds similar in name to obsessive-compulsive anxiety disorder, the two are markedly different disorders. People with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder are overly focused on orderliness and perfection. Their need to do everything &quot;right&quot; often interferes with their productivity. They tend to get caught up in the details and miss the bigger picture. They set unreasonably high standards for themselves and others, and tend to be very critical of others when they do not live up to these high standards. They avoid working in teams, believing others to be too careless or incompetent. They avoid making decisions because they fear making mistakes and are rarely generous with their time or money. They often have difficulty expressing emotion.</p>
<p>And to think I always imagined myself to be a complete AntiSocial&#8230;.. <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though I think the fact that I took the test and am spending time writing about it should in itself constitute some personality disorder <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/07/05/personality-disorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angel Investors in India?</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/06/21/angel-investors-in-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/06/21/angel-investors-in-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fROM tHe GreeNfiElds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/06/21/angel-investors-in-india/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While going through Paul Grahm&#8217;s site , I came in touch with a lot of interesting ideas/concepts regarding startup&#8217;s. Love the hacker-investor relation theory    
I dont know whats the current situation in India, but I think the &#34;geek-has-brilliant-idea-gets-funded-and-becomes-millionaire&#34; story is not at all common here. But its pretty common in US and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While going through <a href="http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-admin/www.paulgraham.com" target="_blank">Paul Grahm&#8217;s site</a> , I came in touch with a lot of interesting ideas/concepts regarding startup&#8217;s. Love the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.paulgraham.com/guidetoinvestors.html">hacker-investor relation theory </a> <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I dont know whats the current situation in India, but I think the &quot;geek-has-brilliant-idea-gets-funded-and-becomes-millionaire&quot; story is not at all common here. But its pretty common in US and its really useful (and more importantly fun <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) to learn from their experiences if you are looking at start-up&#8217;s. Anyway&#8230;.A new term for me in that respect was the term Angel Investor.</p>
<p>Angel Investors (or simply Angels) are affluent individuals who provide capital for business start-ups, usually in exchange for an equity stake. Unlike venture capitalists, angels typically do not pool money in a professionally-managed fund. However, angel investors often organize themselves in angel networks or angel groups to share research and pool investment capital.  </p>
<p>Intresting Idea and I also think it make a lot of sense for the startup since they can get support by puttling less at stake and while they are mature enough to more into talk to VC&#8217;s they would be in a much stronger position and also better educated in the tricks and trade from the master himself <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A very interesting write up on one of them is available at the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18628572/site/newsweek/">msnbc site</a>.It seems to pretty similar to the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/dragonsden/">dragon&#8217;s den</a> show that I loved to watch while in UK, except that here the money involved is much less and also the stake they ask for in the company is also very low.</p>
<p>&nbsp;In this respect,when can we see a <a target="_blank" href="http://ycombinator.com/">Ycombinator</a> in India, or does it exist already? </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/06/21/angel-investors-in-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Clocks</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/05/16/virtual-clocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/05/16/virtual-clocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TECHbabble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/05/16/vitrual-clocks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(From a yahho goup I subscribe to)
By definiton, virtual clock is a clock which doesn&#8217;t have any design object associated with it.
Virtual Clocks are generally used to constraint the IOs (Inputs &#38; Outputs) of a block.
Consider a big design with two sub-blocks, block &#8216;A&#8217; and block &#8216;B&#8217;. Suppose there is a timing path going from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(From a yahho goup I subscribe to)</p>
<p>By definiton, virtual clock is a clock which doesn&#8217;t have any design object associated with it.</p>
<p>Virtual Clocks are generally used to constraint the IOs (Inputs &amp; Outputs) of a block.</p>
<p>Consider a big design with two sub-blocks, block &#8216;A&#8217; and block &#8216;B&#8217;. Suppose there is a timing path going from a register x_reg (clocked by &#8216;clk1&#8242;) (in block A) to register y_reg (clocked by &#8216;clk2&#8242;) (in block B).</p>
<p>If you are analyzing this design at the top-level, the analysis tool can associate both the clocks with some design objects and hence there is no need for virtual clocks.</p>
<p>Now if you are doing analysis at block-level (say Block &#8216;B&#8217;), and you have to tell the tool that timing path ending at y_reg register is launched by a clock &quot;clk1&quot;. The only way to do this is to create a virtual clock.<br />For creating clk2 you have some design object (port/pin) available, since it exist in block &#8216;B&#8217; itself. But block &#8216;A&#8217; is out of the scope of the current environment, and you have to define &quot;clk1&quot; as virtual clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/05/16/virtual-clocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yield Loss and Defect Level</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/26/yield-loss-and-defect-level/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/26/yield-loss-and-defect-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/26/yield-loss-and-defect-level/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reference to chip testing
Yield loss is that fraction of good chips from &#160;the total number of chips that are rejected as bad chips during testing
Defect Level is that fraction of bad chips that are passed during testing as good chips
This issue occurs because to create ideals tests or defect based tests&#160; is very hard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to chip testing</p>
<p>Yield loss is that fraction of good chips from &nbsp;the total number of chips that are rejected as bad chips during testing</p>
<p>Defect Level is that fraction of bad chips that are passed during testing as good chips</p>
<p>This issue occurs because to create ideals tests or <em>defect based tests</em>&nbsp; is very hard due to the complexity in modeling the real defects properly and also the inability to exhaustivily cover all real defects. Instead &quot;fault models&quot; like stuck at fault etc are develops which does not map on to real defects 100%</p>
<p>Hence some good chips are rejected and some bad chips are passed</p>
<p>Good chips&nbsp;&nbsp; Prob of pass = high&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; Mostly good chips<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&gt;&gt;<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Prob Of Fail&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * Prob of pass<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(Low)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (Low)<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp; *<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * <br />&nbsp;Bad Chips&nbsp;&nbsp; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt;&gt;&nbsp; Mostly Bad Chips<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Prob Of Fail <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; High</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/26/yield-loss-and-defect-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>retrocon</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/20/retrocon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/20/retrocon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/20/retrocon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[retroactive continuity &#8211; usually applies to television and film, when they revise something that happened in the past, possibly Conflicting with previous material
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>retroactive continuity &#8211; usually applies to television and film, when they revise something that happened in the past, possibly Conflicting with previous material</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/20/retrocon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ad hominem argument</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/19/ad-hominem-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/19/ad-hominem-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RaNTs@eARTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/19/ad-hominem-argument/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An informal fallacy in which one arguer uses a logically irrelevant &#34;attack&#34; on another arguer as a reason to disregard the second arguer&#8217;s argument. It is a fallacy of relevance. there are three types, Abusive, circumstantial and tu quoque.
Something that has been done to me plenty of times and unknowingly done many times too  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An informal fallacy in which one arguer uses a logically irrelevant &quot;attack&quot; on another arguer as a reason to disregard the second arguer&#8217;s argument. It is a fallacy of relevance. there are three types, Abusive, circumstantial and tu quoque.</p>
<p>Something that has been done to me plenty of times and unknowingly done many times too <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Added this logic book to my todo&#8230;.let me see when this happens <img src='http://www.martiangeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.uky.edu/~rosdatte/phi120/lesson7a.htm">http://www.uky.edu/~rosdatte/phi120/lesson7a.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/04/19/ad-hominem-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRE &amp; MOQ</title>
		<link>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/03/13/nre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/03/13/nre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cafm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[unEarthly tERms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/03/13/nre/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NRE &#8211; Non Recurring Cost In the electronics industry (or any industry for that matter), is the one time cost involved in developing a product. for example NRE&#8217;s are obviously higher for ASIC&#8217;s than FPGA&#8217;s.&#160;
MOQ &#8211; Minimum Order Quantity The minimum quantity of a product that must be sold so that the project breaks even. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NRE &#8211; Non Recurring Cost In the electronics industry (or any industry for that matter), is the one time cost involved in developing a product. for example NRE&#8217;s are obviously higher for ASIC&#8217;s than FPGA&#8217;s.&nbsp;</p>
<p>MOQ &#8211; Minimum Order Quantity The minimum quantity of a product that must be sold so that the project breaks even. When NRE is high MOQ also becomes high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martiangeek.com/2007/03/13/nre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

